Wait. One platform for content, storefronts, and messaging all together. William Lebovics on YESODI is describing what he built: an invitation-only social space where creators can post, sell, and connect without ads. Follow William Lebovics to see what he's working on.
Wait. A creator wants to build the opposite of what most platforms offer: a space that doesn't depend on advertising, surveillance, or algorithmic feeds designed to addict. How does someone actually make that real?
The Problem With Attention Economics
For the last fifteen years, the internet has organized itself around a particular business model: free platforms that make money by selling access to user attention. This model shapes everything we see. Algorithms are designed to maximize engagement, which means maximizing time spent, which means maximizing what you see that triggers emotion. The platforms themselves don't charge users because the users are not customers. The advertisers are the customers. This creates an inherent tension between what serves the person using the platform and what serves the business.
Creators especially feel this tension. A visual artist or writer or musician spends months making work, posts it to a major platform, and then discovers that algorithmic distribution has nothing to do with quality or relevance to their actual audience. Instead, it depends on metrics that drive engagement for everyone, not understanding for specific communities. The platform's incentive is to keep all users watching all content, not to help a ceramicist reach people who actually want to buy pottery.
Alternative Models in Membership
Over the past decade, a different approach has quietly grown. Membership and subscription models remove the advertising layer entirely. Instead of advertisers paying for eyeballs, actual users pay for access to content or community or functionality. Patreon pioneered this for independent creators. Substack did it for writers. Discord created spaces where communities could gather and talk without ads. These platforms shifted the incentive structure: the platform succeeds when it keeps the creator and audience relationship strong, not when it maximizes engagement for unknown purposes.
This model changes what gets built. Without advertising, there is no algorithmic feed designed to keep you scrolling. Without advertising, there is no data harvesting justified by "improving relevance." Without advertising, a feature that helps a small group of people connect deeply can exist even if it doesn't scale globally.
Building All In One Place
What makes managing an independent creative practice difficult is fragmentation. A creator typically needs separate tools. One platform for publishing. Another for selling products. Another for email or direct messaging. Another for community discussion. Each has its own login, its own audience, its own rules. Managing a true business means juggling five or six different interfaces and wondering if the audience on one platform sees what matters on another.
Some creators have imagined what it would look like to have all of that in one place, designed for independence rather than extraction. Combine the publishing space, the storefront for sales, and the messaging system so that a creator and their audience can interact in one environment that belongs to the creator, not to a platform.
Why This Matters Now
The creator economy has become serious. Millions of people now depend on digital work for income. They are sophisticated enough to understand that they need to own their audience relationships. They know that any platform can change its algorithm, its policies, or its terms of service. They understand that the most valuable thing they have is the direct relationship with the people who care about their work.
This shifts what people seek in tools. Not reach, necessarily. Not virality. But control, transparency, and the ability to bundle the functions they need without being at the mercy of separate algorithms or separate companies deciding what matters. When creators ask for an "all in one space," what they really mean is: a place designed for my success, not for infinite growth and ad revenue.
That question is worth understanding, even if you never build a platform yourself. It reveals something about how the internet could be organized differently, and why more people are asking that question.
More videos by Oddly Amazing →
Watch on Yesodi → Join Yesodi →